Next Money
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Cloud
    • Features
    • Identity
    • Insurance
    • Crypto
    • Open Banking
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Retail
    • Security
    • Startups
    • Wealth
  • Agency
  • Founders
  • About
  • Privacy policy
Facebook 13K Likes
Twitter 18K Followers
YouTube 795 Subscribers
LinkedIn
Next Money
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Cloud
    • Features
    • Identity
    • Insurance
    • Crypto
    • Open Banking
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Retail
    • Security
    • Startups
    • Wealth
  • Agency
  • Founders
  • About
  • News
  • Business

Which Bank apps Are The fastest?

  • Neil Martin
  • June 2, 2020
  • No comments
  • 3 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

We gave 12 banking apps some key speed tests to see if the newbies are as quick as they say.

It’s a battle of the old banks versus the new kids on the block, the challengers.

Thanks as always to Peter Ramsey of Built for Mars, a man who gives modern banking a great deal of thought and is a UX zen master. He opened accounts with 12 august institutuions and gave their apps a test drive.

So, lets kick off with the first question: how many clicks to make a first payment? Peter courageously made a first payment from each.

Oh right, interesting result. A three-way tie between Co-op, first direct and Starling. Then there comes a mixture in the middle space between old and new, with Barclays and Santander bring up the rear with a marathon like 18 and 20 clicks respectively.

But, as Peter points out, perhaps a better test is to see how many seconds it took him to make a payment. So, lets look at that.

Whoa, so main insight is that the number of clicks does not always translate into a faster experience. Certainly not a better experience. For example, Peter was 39% faster on Monzo than he was on Lloyds, despite Lloyds requiring fewer clicks.

Now, you might well ask, does it really matter that Nationwide was almost a minute longer than Monzo (3x longer in fact)? I for one would say yes. I have a very low attention span, so more than one minute I’d be stressing and looking for the coffee pot.

Having got this information, Peter moved on to how fast the payment notifications were sent. And are the challenger banks faster than the traditional banks? To find out, he made a series of identical payments for £1 with the same online merchant. He timed how long it took for that payment to appear in his app and he did this three times for each bank—averaging the results.

These were online transactions and he started the timer from when he clicked to make the purchase. So these times will be considerably slower than making a contactless payment in-person.

The result was that with the challenger banks, the average time for the payment to show was between 11 and 12 seconds. With the traditional banks, it was at least 25 seconds, sometimes a lot more. And, the challengers updated in real time, without any refresh needed, whereas the senior citizens needed a hard refresh to show pending payments (Metro, Santander and Nationwide were exceptions though).

As for consistency, the newbies were “very” consistent, whereas the oldies were “very” inconsistent, and some of these weren’t showing a payment even after an hour. Indeed, the challenger banks were at least twice as fast at displaying the payment in the app and in some instances, they were 100 times faster!

So this is what Peter concludes: “Whilst this difference may seem fairly small, its effect is far more significant. Monzo, Revolut and Starling feel instant. Say it took an extra second for the light to come on when you flip a light switch, you wouldn’t consider the light to be nearly instant. It’d feel slow.

“In comparison that’s how the traditional banks feel. Consumers are now aware that it’s possible to get a notification immediately, so anything less than instant—be it 30 seconds or 30 minutes—feels like a step backwards.”

A step backwards. Well said Peter, one up for the challengers then!

And they’ll be more of these tests to come!

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Neil Martin

Neil Martin is the editor of Next Money. He is a financial journalist who writes on fintech, financial services and automation. He also wanted to be a backing singer for a R&B band, but he can't sing, so took up road cycling instead. Please feel free to follow him on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Medium. And email him if you have a story, or thoughts on fintech in general: [email protected]

Previous Article
  • News
  • Business
  • Insurance

PolicyStreet raises RM7.8m

  • Neil Martin
  • June 2, 2020
View Post
Next Article
  • News
  • Payments

Grab grabs the Philippines with GrabPay

  • Neil Martin
  • June 3, 2020
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Asia
  • Business
  • News
  • Payments

Why is the QR code payment gaining traction in SE Asia?

  • Neil Martin
  • February 23, 2021
View Post
  • News
  • Business
  • Crypto
  • US

Get bitcoins from an ATM

  • Neil Martin
  • February 13, 2021
View Post
  • Europe
  • Business
  • News
  • Payments

Klarna launches bank accounts in Germany

  • News Team
  • February 10, 2021
View Post
  • Appointments
  • Business
  • News

Latest appointments

  • News Team
  • January 28, 2021
View Post
  • News
  • Business
  • US

Round-Up (end 22 January, 2021)

  • Neil Martin
  • January 24, 2021
View Post
  • Asia
  • Business
  • News

Fintech boss to acquire airline?

  • News Team
  • January 18, 2021
View Post
  • News
  • Business
  • Weekly round up

Round-Up (end 15 January, 2021)

  • Neil Martin
  • January 15, 2021
View Post
  • News
  • Asia
  • Business

LatticeX comments on OCC’s groundbreaking guidance on stablecoin and cypto-payment networks

  • News Team
  • January 14, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Digital Product Consulting & Digital Transformation Services - CreITive
  • Home
  • Agency
  • Founders
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact

Copyright © 2020 Next Money Limited

Input your search keywords and press Enter.